Patrick Ewing vs Tim Duncan

5of 9 lines

4of 9 lines

Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan compared on their NBA careers: Patrick Ewing played 17 seasons, 1985-86 to 2001-02, Tim Duncan 19 seasons, 1997-98 to 2015-16. Patrick Ewing averaged 21 points a game to Tim Duncan's 19. They have faced each other 7 times: Patrick Ewing's team won 2, Tim Duncan's 5. Tim Duncan won 5 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Patrick Ewing leads in 5 of the 9 lines, Tim Duncan in 4. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan career per game
1,183GP1,392
34.3MIN34
21, betterPTS19
9.8REB10.8, better
1.9AST3, better
1, betterSTL0.7
2.4, betterBLK2.2
50.4FG%50.6, better
15.23P%17.9, better
74, betterFT%69.6
55.3, betterTS%55.1

Patrick Ewing vs Tim Duncan head to head

They have faced each other 7 times: Patrick Ewing's team won 2, Tim Duncan's 5.

Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan, record against each other
GamesPlayedPatrick Ewing wonTim Duncan won
Regular season725, better
Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan, averages in their games against each other
13.1PTS19.9, better
9.0REB11.4, better
0.7AST2.1, better
28.9MIN36.6

Every game against each other

Patrick Ewing vs Tim Duncan, every game
Nov 6, 2001ORL at SAL 104-8912 PTS, 2 REB, 0 AST, 13 MIN26 PTS, 14 REB, 3 AST, 43 MIN
Apr 18, 2001SA at OKCW 105-678 PTS, 10 REB, 1 AST, 33 MIN9 PTS, 4 REB, 1 AST, 20 MIN
Mar 6, 2001SA at OKCL 101-738 PTS, 4 REB, 2 AST, 26 MIN22 PTS, 9 REB, 1 AST, 39 MIN
Nov 22, 2000OKC at SAL 112-856 PTS, 9 REB, 0 AST, 30 MIN11 PTS, 12 REB, 0 AST, 31 MIN
Mar 12, 2000SA at NYW 93-8021 PTS, 15 REB, 2 AST, 32 MIN15 PTS, 13 REB, 3 AST, 40 MIN
Jan 22, 2000NY at SAL 96-8312 PTS, 8 REB, 0 AST, 31 MIN33 PTS, 15 REB, 5 AST, 44 MIN
Dec 2, 1997NY at SAL 90-8425 PTS, 15 REB, 0 AST, 37 MIN23 PTS, 13 REB, 2 AST, 39 MIN

Games both played on opposite sides, from the game logs on file; the record is their teams’.

Career totals

Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan career totals
24,815PTS26,496, better
11,607REB15,091, better
2,215AST4,225, better
1,136, betterSTL1,025
2,894BLK3,020, better
50.4FG%50.6, better
15.23P%17.9, better
74, betterFT%69.6
55.3, betterTS%55.1

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan postseason
139GP251
37.5MIN37.3
20.2PTS20.6, better
10.3REB11.4, better
2AST3, better
0.9, betterSTL0.7
2.2BLK2.3, better
46.9FG%50.1, better
34.8, better3P%14.3
71.8, betterFT%68.9
51.7TS%54.8, better

Where each stands all time

Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan all-time places
28th (24,815)Points20th (26,496), better
25th (11,607)Rebounds6th (15,091), better
112th (1,136), betterSteals157th (1,025)
7th (2,894)Blocks5th (3,020), better
—Assists107th (4,225), better

Among the NBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan titles and awards
—Championships5, better
1Rookie of the Year1
1All-Rookie First Team1
6, betterAll-NBA Second Team3
2All-Defensive Second Team7, better
1All-NBA First Team10, better
—All-Defensive First Team8, better
—Finals MVP3, better
—All-Star MVP1, better
—MVP2, better
—All-NBA Third Team2, better

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Patrick Ewing and Tim Duncan season by season
PTS: Points scored — a free throw is worth 1, a shot inside the arc 2, beyond it 3.REB: Missed shots the player collected, at either end of the floor.AST: Passes that led directly to a team-mate's basket.PTS: Points scored — a free throw is worth 1, a shot inside the arc 2, beyond it 3.REB: Missed shots the player collected, at either end of the floor.AST: Passes that led directly to a team-mate's basket.
1st1985-8620.09.02.01997-9821.1, better11.9, better2.7, better
2nd1986-8721.58.81.71998-9921.7, better11.4, better2.4, better
3rd1987-8820.28.21.51999-0023.2, better12.4, better3.2, better
4th1988-8922.7, better9.32.42000-0122.212.2, better3.0, better
5th1989-9028.6, better10.92.22001-0225.512.7, better3.7, better
6th1990-9126.6, better11.23.02002-0323.312.9, better3.9, better
7th1991-9224.0, better11.21.92003-0422.312.4, better3.1, better
8th1992-9324.2, better12.1, better1.92004-0520.311.12.7, better
9th1993-9424.5, better11.2, better2.32005-0618.611.03.2, better
10th1994-9523.9, better11.0, better2.72006-0720.010.63.4, better
11th1995-9622.5, better10.62.12007-0819.311.3, better2.8, better
12th1996-9722.4, better10.72.02008-0919.310.73.5, better
13th1997-9820.8, better10.2, better1.12009-1017.910.13.2, better
14th1998-9917.3, better9.9, better1.12010-1113.48.92.7, better
15th1999-0015.09.7, better0.92011-1215.4, better9.02.3, better
16th2000-019.67.41.22012-1317.8, better9.9, better2.7, better
17th2001-026.04.00.52013-1415.1, better9.7, better3.0, better
18th————2014-1513.99.13.0
19th————2015-168.67.32.7

What the columns mean: PTS · REB · AST