Deacon Phillippe vs Sam Leever

3of 7 lines

4of 7 lines

Deacon Phillippe and Sam Leever compared on their MLB careers: Deacon Phillippe played 13 seasons, 1899 to 1911, Sam Leever 13 seasons, 1898 to 1910. Deacon Phillippe has 189 wins to Sam Leever's 194. Deacon Phillippe won 1 title, Sam Leever won 1 title.

Who has the better career numbers?

Sam Leever leads in 4 of the 7 lines, Deacon Phillippe in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Deacon Phillippe and Sam Leever career totals

372	GP	388
189	W	194, better
109	L	100, better
2.6	ERA	2.5, better
2,607	IP	2,660.2
929, better	K	847
363, better	BB	587
1.1, better	WHIP	1.1
12	SV	13, better

How do they compare in the postseason?

Deacon Phillippe and Sam Leever postseason

7	GP	2
3, better	W	0
2	L	2
2.5, better	ERA	5.4
50	IP	10
24, better	K	2
4	BB	3, better
0.9, better	WHIP	1.6
0	SV	0

Where each stands all time

Deacon Phillippe and Sam Leever all-time places
Deacon Phillippe	All-time rank	Sam Leever
142nd (189)	Wins (pitching)	128th (194), better

Among the MLB players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Deacon Phillippe and Sam Leever titles and awards
Deacon Phillippe	Title or award	Sam Leever
1	Championships	1

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Deacon Phillippe and Sam Leever season by season

1st	1899	21, better	17	3.17	1898	1	0, better	2.45, better
2nd	1900	20	13, better	2.84, better	1899	21, better	23	3.18
3rd	1901	22, better	12, better	2.22, better	1900	15	13	2.71
4th	1902	20, better	9	2.05, better	1901	14	5, better	2.86
5th	1903	25, better	9	2.43	1902	15	7, better	2.39, better
6th	1904	10	10	3.24	1903	25, better	7, better	2.06, better
7th	1905	20, better	13	2.19	1904	18	11, better	2.17, better
8th	1906	15	10	2.47, better	1905	20, better	5, better	2.70
9th	1907	14	11	2.61	1906	22, better	7, better	2.32, better
10th	1908	0	0, better	11.25	1907	14, better	9	1.66, better
11th	1909	8	3, better	2.32	1908	15, better	7	2.10, better
12th	1910	14, better	2	2.29, better	1909	8	1, better	2.83
13th	1911	0	0, better	7.50	1910	6, better	5	2.76, better

What the columns mean: W · L · ERA