Ed Earle vs Jim Holstein

0of 3 lines

3of 3 lines

Ed Earle and Jim Holstein compared on their NBA careers: Ed Earle played 1 season, 1953-54 to 1953-54, Jim Holstein 4 seasons, 1952-53 to 1955-56. Ed Earle averaged 2 points a game to Jim Holstein's 3.8. Jim Holstein won 2 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Jim Holstein leads in 3 of the 3 lines, Ed Earle in 0. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Ed Earle and Jim Holstein career per game
2GP225
6MIN15.4
2PTS3.8, better
1REB2.9, better
0AST1.1, better

Ed Earle and Jim Holstein: no career line is published, so it is worked out from the seasons on file — career totals divided by games played.

Titles and awards

Ed Earle and Jim Holstein titles and awards
Ed EarleTitle or awardJim Holstein
—Championships2, better

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Ed Earle and Jim Holstein season by season
PTS: Points scored — a free throw is worth 1, a shot inside the arc 2, beyond it 3.REB: Missed shots the player collected, at either end of the floor.AST: Passes that led directly to a team-mate's basket.PTS: Points scored — a free throw is worth 1, a shot inside the arc 2, beyond it 3.REB: Missed shots the player collected, at either end of the floor.AST: Passes that led directly to a team-mate's basket.
1st1953-542101952-534.0, better2.6, better1.1, better
2nd————1953-543.42.91.1
3rd————1954-554.53.30.9
4th————1955-562.72.81.4

What the columns mean: PTS · REB · AST