Andrew Lang vs Kelvin Cato

Andrew Lang and Kelvin Cato compared on their NBA careers: Andrew Lang played 12 seasons, 1988-89 to 1999-00, Kelvin Cato 10 seasons, 1997-98 to 2006-07. Andrew Lang averaged 6 points a game to Kelvin Cato's 5.5.

Who has the better career numbers?

Andrew Lang and Kelvin Cato career per game
737GP541
20.8MIN19.6
6PTS5.5
4.8REB5.3
0.6AST0.5
0.5STL0.5
1.5BLK1.3
47FG%50.7
253P%7.7
74.4FT%64.4
51.6TS%54.8

Career totals

Andrew Lang and Kelvin Cato career totals
4,431PTS2,960
3,511REB2,874
424AST244
332STL292
1,099BLK685
47FG%50.7
253P%7.7
74.4FT%64.4
51.6TS%54.8

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Andrew Lang and Kelvin Cato postseason
42GP21
16.3MIN12.6
4.6PTS3.2
3.2REB2.9
0.3AST0.2
0.4STL0.3
1.2BLK0.6
44.4FG%49.1
03P%0
77FT%53.6
52TS%51.3

Where each stands all time

Andrew Lang and Kelvin Cato all-time places
Andrew LangAll-time rankKelvin Cato
75th (1,099)Blocks165th (685)

Among the NBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

  • Andrew Lang: 0 championships; none on file
  • Kelvin Cato: 0 championships; none on file

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Andrew Lang and Kelvin Cato season by season
PTS: Points scored — a free throw is worth 1, a shot inside the arc 2, beyond it 3.REB: Missed shots the player collected, at either end of the floor.AST: Passes that led directly to a team-mate's basket.PTS: Points scored — a free throw is worth 1, a shot inside the arc 2, beyond it 3.REB: Missed shots the player collected, at either end of the floor.AST: Passes that led directly to a team-mate's basket.
1st1988-892.62.40.11997-983.83.40.3
2nd1989-903.53.70.31998-993.53.50.4
3rd1990-914.94.80.41999-008.760.4
4th1991-927.76.70.52000-014.740.3
5th1992-935.361.12001-026.670.4
6th1993-946.13.80.62002-034.55.90.3
7th1994-959.75.60.92003-046.16.81
8th1995-9611.76.40.92004-0576.70.6
9th1996-975.35.30.52005-063.62.60.1
10th1997-982.72.70.32006-071.21.70
11th1998-993.84.40.6
12th1999-003.13.20.2

What the columns mean: PTS · REB · AST