Roger Clemens vs Roy Halladay

4of 7 lines

3of 7 lines

Roger Clemens and Roy Halladay compared on their MLB careers: Roger Clemens played 24 seasons, 1984 to 2007, Roy Halladay 16 seasons, 1998 to 2013. Roger Clemens has 354 wins to Roy Halladay's 203. Roger Clemens won 2 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Roger Clemens leads in 4 of the 7 lines, Roy Halladay in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Roger Clemens and Roy Halladay career totals

709	GP	416
354, better	W	203
184	L	105, better
3.1, better	ERA	3.4
4,916.2	IP	2,749.1
4,672, better	K	2,117
1,580	BB	592, better
1.2, better	WHIP	1.2
0	SV	1, better

How do they compare in the postseason?

Roger Clemens and Roy Halladay postseason

35	GP	5
12, better	W	3
8	L	2, better
3.8	ERA	2.4, better
197.1	IP	38
173, better	K	35
70	BB	5, better
1.2	WHIP	0.7, better
0	SV	0

Where each stands all time

Roger Clemens and Roy Halladay all-time places

3rd (4,672), better	Strikeouts (pitching)	75th (2,117)
9th (354), better	Wins (pitching)	107th (203)

Among the MLB players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Roger Clemens and Roy Halladay titles and awards

2, better	Championships	—
1, better	AL MVP	—
6, better	AL Cy Young	1
1	NL Cy Young	1

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Roger Clemens and Roy Halladay season by season

1st	1984	9, better	4	4.32	1998	1	0, better	1.93, better
2nd	1985	7	5, better	3.29, better	1999	8, better	7	3.92
3rd	1986	24, better	4, better	2.48, better	2000	4	7	10.64
4th	1987	20, better	9	2.97, better	2001	5	3, better	3.16
5th	1988	18	12	2.93	2002	19, better	7, better	2.93
6th	1989	17	11	3.13, better	2003	22, better	7, better	3.25
7th	1990	21, better	6, better	1.93, better	2004	8	8	4.20
8th	1991	18, better	10	2.62	2005	12	4, better	2.41, better
9th	1992	18, better	11	2.41, better	2006	16	5, better	3.19
10th	1993	11	14	4.46	2007	16, better	7, better	3.71, better
11th	1994	9	7, better	2.85	2008	20, better	11	2.78, better
12th	1995	10	5, better	4.18	2009	17, better	10	2.79, better
13th	1996	10	13	3.63	2010	21, better	10, better	2.44, better
14th	1997	21, better	7	2.05, better	2011	19	6, better	2.35
15th	1998	20, better	6, better	2.65, better	2012	11	8	4.49
16th	1999	14, better	10	4.60, better	2013	4	5, better	6.82
17th	2000	13	8	3.70	—	—	—	—
18th	2001	20	3	3.51	—	—	—	—
19th	2002	13	6	4.35	—	—	—	—
20th	2003	17	9	3.91	—	—	—	—
21st	2004	18	4	2.98	—	—	—	—
22nd	2005	13	8	1.87	—	—	—	—
23rd	2006	7	6	2.30	—	—	—	—
24th	2007	6	6	4.18	—	—	—	—

What the columns mean: W · L · ERA