Madison Bumgarner vs Tim Lincecum

2of 7 lines

Madison Bumgarner and Tim Lincecum compared on their MLB careers: Madison Bumgarner played 15 seasons, 2009 to 2023, Tim Lincecum 10 seasons, 2007 to 2016. Madison Bumgarner has 134 wins to Tim Lincecum's 110. Madison Bumgarner won 3 titles, Tim Lincecum won 3 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Madison Bumgarner leads in 5 of the 7 lines, Tim Lincecum in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Madison Bumgarner and Tim Lincecum career totals
361GP278
134, betterW110
124L89, better
3.5, betterERA3.7
2,209.1IP1,682
2,070, betterK1,736
544, betterBB669
1.2, betterWHIP1.3
0SV1, better

How do they compare in the postseason?

Madison Bumgarner and Tim Lincecum postseason
16GP13
8, betterW5
3L2, better
2.1, betterERA2.4
102.1IP56.1
87, betterK65
18BB14, better
0.9WHIP0.9, better
1, betterSV0

Where each stands all time

Madison Bumgarner and Tim Lincecum all-time places
Madison BumgarnerAll-time rankTim Lincecum
84th (2,070), betterStrikeouts (pitching)141st (1,736)

Among the MLB players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Madison Bumgarner and Tim Lincecum titles and awards
3Championships3
—NL Cy Young2, better
2, betterNL Silver Slugger—
1, betterWorld Series MVP—

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Madison Bumgarner and Tim Lincecum season by season
W: Games in which this pitcher was credited with the win.L: Games in which this pitcher was charged with the loss.ERA: Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched — lower is better. Under 3.00 is excellent.W: Games in which this pitcher was credited with the win.L: Games in which this pitcher was charged with the loss.ERA: Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched — lower is better. Under 3.00 is excellent.
1st200900, better1.80, better20077, better54.00
2nd2010763.00200818, better5, better2.62, better
3rd201113133.21200915, better7, better2.48, better
4th201216113.37, better20101610, better3.43
5th2013139, better2.77201113142.74, better
6th201418, better10, better2.98, better201210155.18
7th201518, better9, better2.93, better201310144.37
8th201615, better92.74, better20141294.74
9th2017493.32, better20157, better4, better4.13
10th20186, better73.26, better201626, better9.16
11th2019993.90————
12th2020146.48————
13th20217104.67————
14th20227154.88————
15th20230310.26————

What the columns mean: W · L · ERA