Jacob deGrom vs Tim Lincecum

Jacob deGrom

5of 7 lines

Tim Lincecum

2of 7 lines

Jacob deGrom and Tim Lincecum compared on their MLB careers: Jacob deGrom played 13 seasons, 2014 to 2026, Tim Lincecum 10 seasons, 2007 to 2016. Jacob deGrom has 107 wins to Tim Lincecum's 110. Jacob deGrom won 1 title, Tim Lincecum won 3 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Jacob deGrom leads in 5 of the 7 lines, Tim Lincecum in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Jacob deGrom and Tim Lincecum career totals
279GP278
107W110, better
76, betterL89
2.7, betterERA3.7
1,702.1IP1,682
2,052, betterK1,736
391, betterBB669
1, betterWHIP1.3
0SV1, better

How do they compare in the postseason?

Jacob deGrom and Tim Lincecum postseason
5GP13
4W5, better
1, betterL2
2.9ERA2.4, better
31IP56.1
37K65, better
10, betterBB14
1.2WHIP0.9, better
0SV0

Where each stands all time

Jacob deGrom and Tim Lincecum all-time places
Jacob deGromAll-time rankTim Lincecum
86th (2,052), betterStrikeouts (pitching)141st (1,736)

Among the MLB players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Jacob deGrom and Tim Lincecum titles and awards
1Championships3, better
2NL Cy Young2
1, betterNL Rookie of the Year—

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Jacob deGrom and Tim Lincecum season by season
W: Games in which this pitcher was credited with the win.L: Games in which this pitcher was charged with the loss.ERA: Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched — lower is better. Under 3.00 is excellent.W: Games in which this pitcher was credited with the win.L: Games in which this pitcher was charged with the loss.ERA: Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched — lower is better. Under 3.00 is excellent.
1st20149, better62.69, better200775, better4.00
2nd20151482.54, better200818, better5, better2.62
3rd2016783.04200915, better7, better2.48, better
4th201715103.53201016, better103.43, better
5th2018109, better1.70, better201113, better142.74
6th201911, better8, better2.43, better201210155.18
7th202042, better2.38, better201310, better144.37
8th202172, better1.08, better201412, better94.74
9th2022543.08, better20157, better44.13
10th202320, better2.67, better2016269.16
11th2024001.69————
12th20251282.97————
13th202611114.20————

What the columns mean: W · L · ERA