Cy Young vs Roy Halladay

5of 7 lines

2of 7 lines

Cy Young and Roy Halladay compared on their MLB careers: Cy Young played 22 seasons, 1890 to 1911, Roy Halladay 16 seasons, 1998 to 2013. Cy Young has 511 wins to Roy Halladay's 203. Cy Young won 1 title.

Who has the better career numbers?

Cy Young leads in 5 of the 7 lines, Roy Halladay in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Cy Young and Roy Halladay career totals

906	GP	416
511, better	W	203
316	L	105, better
2.6, better	ERA	3.4
7,354.2	IP	2,749.1
2,803, better	K	2,117
1,217	BB	592, better
1.1, better	WHIP	1.2
17, better	SV	1

How do they compare in the postseason?

Cy Young and Roy Halladay postseason

7	GP	5
2	W	3, better
3	L	2, better
2.4, better	ERA	2.4
61	IP	38
26	K	35, better
7	BB	5, better
1.1	WHIP	0.7, better
0	SV	0

Where each stands all time

Cy Young and Roy Halladay all-time places

25th (2,803), better	Strikeouts (pitching)	75th (2,117)
1st (511), better	Wins (pitching)	107th (203)

Among the MLB players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Cy Young and Roy Halladay titles and awards

1, better	Championships	—
—	AL Cy Young	1, better
—	NL Cy Young	1, better

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Cy Young and Roy Halladay season by season

1st	1890	9, better	7	3.47	1998	1	0, better	1.93, better
2nd	1891	27, better	22	2.85, better	1999	8	7, better	3.92
3rd	1892	36, better	12	1.93, better	2000	4	7, better	10.64
4th	1893	34, better	16	3.36	2001	5	3, better	3.16, better
5th	1894	26, better	21	3.94	2002	19	7, better	2.93, better
6th	1895	35, better	10	3.26	2003	22	7, better	3.25, better
7th	1896	28, better	15	3.24, better	2004	8	8, better	4.20
8th	1897	21, better	19	3.80	2005	12	4, better	2.41, better
9th	1898	25, better	13	2.53, better	2006	16	5, better	3.19
10th	1899	26, better	16	2.58, better	2007	16	7, better	3.71
11th	1900	19	19	3.00	2008	20, better	11, better	2.78, better
12th	1901	33, better	10	1.62, better	2009	17	10	2.79
13th	1902	32, better	11	2.15, better	2010	21	10, better	2.44
14th	1903	28, better	9	2.08, better	2011	19	6, better	2.35
15th	1904	26, better	16	1.97, better	2012	11	8, better	4.49
16th	1905	18, better	19	1.82, better	2013	4	5, better	6.82
17th	1906	13	21	3.19	—	—	—	—
18th	1907	21	15	1.99	—	—	—	—
19th	1908	21	11	1.26	—	—	—	—
20th	1909	19	15	2.26	—	—	—	—
21st	1910	7	10	2.53	—	—	—	—
22nd	1911	7	9	3.78	—	—	—	—

What the columns mean: W · L · ERA