Quanitra Hollingsworth vs Sasha Goodlett

5of 7 lines

2of 7 lines

Quanitra Hollingsworth and Sasha Goodlett compared on their WNBA careers: Quanitra Hollingsworth played 5 seasons, 2009 to 2015, Sasha Goodlett 4 seasons, 2012 to 2015. Quanitra Hollingsworth averaged 3.6 points a game to Sasha Goodlett's 2.7. Sasha Goodlett won 1 title.

Who has the better career numbers?

Quanitra Hollingsworth leads in 5 of the 7 lines, Sasha Goodlett in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Quanitra Hollingsworth and Sasha Goodlett career per game

124	GP	101
12.2	MIN	10.2
3.6, better	PTS	2.7
3.2, better	REB	1.9
0.2	AST	0.2
0.4, better	STL	0.2
0.2	BLK	0.4, better
45.6, better	FG%	43.7
0	3P%	0
67.3	FT%	74.3, better
52.7, better	TS%	48.1

Career totals

Quanitra Hollingsworth and Sasha Goodlett career totals

450, better	PTS	272
399, better	REB	191
30, better	AST	25
47, better	STL	24
29	BLK	36, better
45.6, better	FG%	43.7
0	3P%	0
67.3	FT%	74.3, better
52.7, better	TS%	48.1

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Quanitra Hollingsworth and Sasha Goodlett postseason

5	GP	8
6	MIN	4.1
2, better	PTS	0.4
1, better	REB	0.6
0	AST	0
0.2	STL	0.3, better
0.2, better	BLK	0
57.1, better	FG%	25
0	3P%	0
100, better	FT%	50
63.5, better	TS%	30.7

Where each stands all time

Quanitra Hollingsworth and Sasha Goodlett all-time places

299th (399), better	Rebounds	—
—	Blocks	290th (36), better

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Quanitra Hollingsworth and Sasha Goodlett titles and awards
Quanitra Hollingsworth	Title or award	Sasha Goodlett
—	Championships	1, better

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Quanitra Hollingsworth and Sasha Goodlett season by season

1st	2009	4.8, better	3.2, better	0.1	2012	3.1	1.6	0.2, better
2nd	2010	1.7	1.8, better	0.2	2013	1.8, better	1.6	0.2
3rd	2011	4.6, better	4.4, better	0.3	2014	3.4	2.4	0.3
4th	2013	1.7	1.4	0.3	2015	2.1, better	1.9, better	0.3
5th	2015	3.2	3.6	0.3	—	—	—	—