Matee Ajavon vs Scholanda Dorrell

4of 8 lines

Matee Ajavon and Scholanda Dorrell compared on their WNBA careers: Matee Ajavon played 10 seasons, 2008 to 2017, Scholanda Dorrell 7 seasons, 2006 to 2012. Matee Ajavon averaged 6.9 points a game to Scholanda Dorrell's 6.7.

Who has the better career numbers?

They are level: each leads in 4 of the 8 lines. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Matee Ajavon and Scholanda Dorrell career per game

323	GP	125
17.4	MIN	17.9
6.9, better	PTS	6.7
1.8, better	REB	1.6
1.8, better	AST	0.8
1	STL	1
0.1	BLK	0.2, better
34.7	FG%	37.2, better
26.6	3P%	31.1, better
78.2, better	FT%	71.2
45.3	TS%	46.6, better

Career totals

Matee Ajavon and Scholanda Dorrell career totals

2,237, better	PTS	839
566, better	REB	197
577, better	AST	99
328, better	STL	130
44, better	BLK	26
34.7	FG%	37.2, better
26.6	3P%	31.1, better
78.2, better	FT%	71.2
45.3	TS%	46.6, better

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Matee Ajavon and Scholanda Dorrell postseason

11	GP	11
15.7	MIN	7.5
7.5, better	PTS	3.2
2, better	REB	0.9
1.4, better	AST	0.5
1.2, better	STL	0.5
0	BLK	0
36.8	FG%	40.7, better
19	3P%	40, better
80.6	FT%	90, better
49.5	TS%	55.7, better

Where each stands all time

Matee Ajavon and Scholanda Dorrell all-time places

144th (2,237), better	Points	—
242nd (566), better	Rebounds	—
113th (577), better	Assists	—
158th (144), better	3-pointers made	222nd (82)
85th (328), better	Steals	240th (130)
260th (44), better	Blocks	—

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Matee Ajavon and Scholanda Dorrell season by season

1st	2008	8.0, better	1.8, better	1.7, better	2006	5.2	1.1	0.5
2nd	2009	8.0, better	1.9, better	1.1, better	2007	5.8	1.4	0.9
3rd	2010	5.9	1.6, better	1.4, better	2008	6.8, better	1.1	0.8
4th	2011	14.7, better	2.4, better	3.1, better	2009	6.6	1.6	0.8
5th	2012	7.9	1.8	2.0, better	2010	11.9, better	2.4, better	1.7
6th	2013	8.9, better	1.7, better	2.9, better	2011	4.8	1.5	0.4
7th	2014	2.2	0.8	0.7, better	2012	4.2, better	1.2, better	0.5
8th	2015	5.9	2.5	2.4	—	—	—	—
9th	2016	3.3	1.6	1.2	—	—	—	—
10th	2017	2.4	1.2	1.0	—	—	—	—