Lynetta Kizer vs Ramu Tokashiki

6of 9 lines

3of 9 lines

Lynetta Kizer and Ramu Tokashiki compared on their WNBA careers: Lynetta Kizer played 7 seasons, 2012 to 2018, Ramu Tokashiki 3 seasons, 2015 to 2017. Lynetta Kizer averaged 5.8 points a game to Ramu Tokashiki's 5.5.

Who has the better career numbers?

Lynetta Kizer leads in 6 of the 9 lines, Ramu Tokashiki in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Lynetta Kizer and Ramu Tokashiki career per game

180	GP	94
12.9	MIN	15.2
5.8, better	PTS	5.5
2.8, better	REB	2.4
0.3	AST	0.6, better
0.5, better	STL	0.3
0.2	BLK	0.4, better
47.7, better	FG%	43.7
21.4, better	3P%	0
79.9	FT%	83.6, better
51.8, better	TS%	49.7

Career totals

Lynetta Kizer and Ramu Tokashiki career totals

1,050, better	PTS	517
498, better	REB	228
62, better	AST	54
87, better	STL	31
40	BLK	40
47.7, better	FG%	43.7
21.4, better	3P%	0
79.9	FT%	83.6, better
51.8, better	TS%	49.7

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Lynetta Kizer and Ramu Tokashiki postseason

20	GP	2
8.6	MIN	13.5
3.1, better	PTS	2.5
1.8	REB	2, better
0.3	AST	0.5, better
0.3, better	STL	0
0.2, better	BLK	0
49.1, better	FG%	16.7
0	3P%	0
66.7	FT%	75, better
50.9, better	TS%	32.2

Where each stands all time

Lynetta Kizer and Ramu Tokashiki all-time places

262nd (1,050), better	Points	—
271st (498), better	Rebounds	—
276th (40)	Blocks	276th (40)

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Lynetta Kizer and Ramu Tokashiki season by season

1st	2012	5.7	3.0	0.3	2015	8.2, better	3.3, better	0.8, better
2nd	2013	2.6	2.1	0.2	2016	5.3, better	2.5, better	0.3, better
3rd	2014	3.8, better	2.4, better	0.1	2017	3.2	1.6	0.6, better
4th	2015	8.3	3.5	0.4	—	—	—	—
5th	2016	9.6	3.2	0.6	—	—	—	—
6th	2017	6.0	2.9	0.3	—	—	—	—
7th	2018	1.6	1.5	0.6	—	—	—	—