Jessica Davenport vs Suzy Batkovic

7of 9 lines

2of 9 lines

Jessica Davenport and Suzy Batkovic compared on their WNBA careers: Jessica Davenport played 6 seasons, 2007 to 2012, Suzy Batkovic 2 seasons, 2005 to 2009. Jessica Davenport averaged 6.6 points a game to Suzy Batkovic's 5. Jessica Davenport won 1 title.

Who has the better career numbers?

Jessica Davenport leads in 7 of the 9 lines, Suzy Batkovic in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Jessica Davenport and Suzy Batkovic career per game

174	GP	49
13.8	MIN	12.5
6.6, better	PTS	5
3.1, better	REB	2.5
0.4	AST	0.6, better
0.5, better	STL	0.4
0.9, better	BLK	0.6
50.8, better	FG%	45.1
14.3	3P%	29.4, better
73.2, better	FT%	71.2
55.8, better	TS%	50.4

Career totals

Jessica Davenport and Suzy Batkovic career totals

1,148, better	PTS	246
539, better	REB	121
73, better	AST	29
82, better	STL	22
151, better	BLK	27
50.8, better	FG%	45.1
14.3	3P%	29.4, better
73.2, better	FT%	71.2
55.8, better	TS%	50.4

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Jessica Davenport and Suzy Batkovic postseason

31	GP	6
10.1	MIN	21.5
4.6	PTS	8.7, better
2.4	REB	3.3, better
0.3, better	AST	0
0.3	STL	0.7, better
0.6	BLK	1.5, better
51.3, better	FG%	50
0	3P%	53.8, better
80, better	FT%	55.6
55.3	TS%	59.1, better

Where each stands all time

Jessica Davenport and Suzy Batkovic all-time places

253rd (1,148), better	Points	—
251st (539), better	Rebounds	—
80th (151), better	Blocks	—

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Jessica Davenport and Suzy Batkovic titles and awards
Jessica Davenport	Title or award	Suzy Batkovic
1, better	Championships	—

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Jessica Davenport and Suzy Batkovic season by season

1st	2007	5.3	2.7	0.3	2005	6.9, better	3.2, better	0.9, better
2nd	2008	4.6, better	2.9, better	0.3, better	2009	2.4	1.5	0.2
3rd	2009	2.8	1.5	0.2	—	—	—	—
4th	2010	7.4	2.8	0.5	—	—	—	—
5th	2011	10.7	4.8	0.5	—	—	—	—
6th	2012	6.7	3.4	0.6	—	—	—	—