Jasmine Thomas vs Odyssey Sims

3of 8 lines

5of 8 lines

Jasmine Thomas and Odyssey Sims compared on their WNBA careers: Jasmine Thomas played 13 seasons, 2011 to 2023, Odyssey Sims 13 seasons, 2014 to 2026. Jasmine Thomas averaged 9 points a game to Odyssey Sims's 10.5.

Who has the better career numbers?

Odyssey Sims leads in 5 of the 8 lines, Jasmine Thomas in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Jasmine Thomas and Odyssey Sims career per game

390	GP	351
24.9	MIN	25.7
9	PTS	10.5, better
2.6, better	REB	2.3
3.5	AST	3.6, better
1	STL	1
0.2, better	BLK	0.1
37.7	FG%	39.7, better
32.8, better	3P%	27.9
79.7	FT%	81.6, better
46.6	TS%	49, better

Career totals

Jasmine Thomas and Odyssey Sims career totals

3,522	PTS	3,676, better
1,027, better	REB	809
1,355, better	AST	1,271
394, better	STL	344
91, better	BLK	41
37.7	FG%	39.7, better
32.8, better	3P%	27.9
79.7	FT%	81.6, better
46.6	TS%	49, better

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Jasmine Thomas and Odyssey Sims postseason

32	GP	44
31.6	MIN	23.7
10.6, better	PTS	10
2.9, better	REB	2.1
3.8, better	AST	3.1
1.1, better	STL	1
0.3, better	BLK	0
38.4	FG%	41.4, better
29.6	3P%	30.2, better
67.9	FT%	87.1, better
45.5	TS%	51.8, better

Where each stands all time

Jasmine Thomas and Odyssey Sims all-time places

73rd (3,522)	Points	67th (3,676), better
126th (1,027), better	Rebounds	170th (809)
21st (1,355), better	Assists	28th (1,271)
50th (376), better	3-pointers made	96th (244)
50th (394), better	Steals	75th (344)
145th (91), better	Blocks	273rd (41)

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Jasmine Thomas and Odyssey Sims season by season

1st	2011	6.4	2.1	1.9	2014	16.7, better	2.8, better	4.2, better
2nd	2012	8.2	2.4	2.8	2015	16.0, better	3.4, better	3.8, better
3rd	2013	8.5	3.0, better	3.1	2016	14.0, better	2.5	3.9, better
4th	2014	4.8	2.1, better	1.6	2017	9.6, better	1.9	3.5, better
5th	2015	8.2	3.7, better	3.9, better	2018	8.2	2.5	2.8
6th	2016	11.7	4.1, better	5.1	2019	14.5, better	3.4	5.4, better
7th	2017	14.2, better	2.3, better	4.3, better	2020	9.4	2.0	3.5
8th	2018	12.9, better	3.3, better	4.8, better	2021	8.7	2.5	3.6
9th	2019	11.1, better	2.9, better	5.1, better	2022	6.9	1.9	2.9
10th	2020	10.2, better	1.7, better	4.0, better	2023	2.0	1.3	2.2
11th	2021	10.6	2.4, better	4.0	2024	12.6, better	2.1	5.3, better
12th	2022	6.6	2.2	3.0	2025	10.1, better	2.4, better	3.8, better
13th	2023	2.7	1.1, better	1.3	2026	4.6, better	0.9	2.0, better