Erica Wheeler vs Jasmine Thomas

5of 7 lines

2of 7 lines

Erica Wheeler and Jasmine Thomas compared on their WNBA careers: Erica Wheeler played 11 seasons, 2015 to 2026, Jasmine Thomas 13 seasons, 2011 to 2023. Erica Wheeler averaged 9 points a game to Jasmine Thomas's 9.

Who has the better career numbers?

Erica Wheeler leads in 5 of the 7 lines, Jasmine Thomas in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Erica Wheeler and Jasmine Thomas career per game

384	GP	390
23.8	MIN	24.9
9	PTS	9
2.4	REB	2.6, better
3.8, better	AST	3.5
1	STL	1
0.1	BLK	0.2, better
40, better	FG%	37.7
33.6, better	3P%	32.8
82.9, better	FT%	79.7
49.1, better	TS%	46.6

Career totals

Erica Wheeler and Jasmine Thomas career totals

3,445	PTS	3,522, better
934	REB	1,027, better
1,473, better	AST	1,355
381	STL	394, better
43	BLK	91, better
40, better	FG%	37.7
33.6, better	3P%	32.8
82.9, better	FT%	79.7
49.1, better	TS%	46.6

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Erica Wheeler and Jasmine Thomas postseason

9	GP	32
14.8	MIN	31.6
5.8	PTS	10.6, better
1.1	REB	2.9, better
1.7	AST	3.8, better
0.3	STL	1.1, better
0	BLK	0.3, better
39.1, better	FG%	38.4
36.8, better	3P%	29.6
90, better	FT%	67.9
51.6, better	TS%	45.5

Where each stands all time

Erica Wheeler and Jasmine Thomas all-time places

79th (3,445)	Points	73rd (3,522), better
148th (934)	Rebounds	126th (1,027), better
16th (1,473), better	Assists	21st (1,355)
49th (380), better	3-pointers made	50th (376)
59th (381)	Steals	50th (394), better
263rd (43)	Blocks	145th (91), better

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Erica Wheeler and Jasmine Thomas season by season

1st	2015	4.5	1.0	1.4	2011	6.4, better	2.1, better	1.9, better
2nd	2016	8.4, better	2.1	2.8	2012	8.2	2.4, better	2.8
3rd	2017	11.8, better	2.2	4.1, better	2013	8.5	3.0, better	3.1
4th	2018	7.8, better	2.9, better	4.1, better	2014	4.8	2.1	1.6
5th	2019	10.1, better	3.0	5.0, better	2015	8.2	3.7, better	3.9
6th	2021	13.6, better	3.1	4.8	2016	11.7	4.1, better	5.1, better
7th	2022	8.4	3.1, better	3.9	2017	14.2, better	2.3	4.3, better
8th	2023	9.9	3.0	5.0, better	2018	12.9, better	3.3, better	4.8
9th	2024	3.6	1.4	1.8	2019	11.1, better	2.9, better	5.1, better
10th	2025	10.3, better	2.7, better	3.3	2020	10.2	1.7	4.0, better
11th	2026	9.0	1.9	5.0, better	2021	10.6, better	2.4, better	4.0
12th	—	—	—	—	2022	6.6	2.2	3.0
13th	—	—	—	—	2023	2.7	1.1	1.3