Emma Meesseman vs Janel McCarville

9of 9 lines

0of 9 lines

Emma Meesseman and Janel McCarville compared on their WNBA careers: Emma Meesseman played 9 seasons, 2013 to 2025, Janel McCarville 9 seasons, 2005 to 2016. Emma Meesseman averaged 11.6 points a game to Janel McCarville's 7.7. Emma Meesseman won 1 title, Janel McCarville won 1 title.

Who has the better career numbers?

Emma Meesseman leads in 9 of the 9 lines, Janel McCarville in 0. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Emma Meesseman and Janel McCarville career per game

255	GP	286
26.1	MIN	21.3
11.6, better	PTS	7.7
5.3, better	REB	4.4
2.7, better	AST	1.9
1.1, better	STL	1
0.9, better	BLK	0.7
52.5, better	FG%	49.1
39.4, better	3P%	27.8
85.5, better	FT%	77.4
57.8, better	TS%	54.1

Career totals

Emma Meesseman and Janel McCarville career totals

2,966, better	PTS	2,215
1,350, better	REB	1,261
681, better	AST	551
276	STL	293, better
238, better	BLK	201
52.5, better	FG%	49.1
39.4, better	3P%	27.8
85.5, better	FT%	77.4
57.8, better	TS%	54.1

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Emma Meesseman and Janel McCarville postseason

34	GP	27
27.2	MIN	23.6
11.9, better	PTS	7.7
4.9, better	REB	4.7
2.4, better	AST	2.2
1, better	STL	0.9
1, better	BLK	0.9
46.7, better	FG%	46
42.3, better	3P%	28.6
75.5, better	FT%	61.5
53, better	TS%	49.1

Where each stands all time

Emma Meesseman and Janel McCarville all-time places

99th (2,966), better	Points	147th (2,215)
82nd (1,350), better	Rebounds	100th (1,261)
92nd (681), better	Assists	120th (551)
194th (109), better	3-pointers made	—
108th (276)	Steals	100th (293), better
40th (238), better	Blocks	54th (201)

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Emma Meesseman and Janel McCarville titles and awards
Emma Meesseman	Title or award	Janel McCarville
1	Championships	1

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Emma Meesseman and Janel McCarville season by season

1st	2013	4.4, better	3.1, better	1.2, better	2005	1.8	2.7	0.4
2nd	2014	10.1, better	6.4, better	2.5, better	2006	4.5	3.5	0.8
3rd	2015	11.6, better	6.3, better	1.7, better	2007	10.4	4.8	1.1
4th	2016	15.2, better	5.6, better	2.3, better	2008	13.7	5.4	2.1
5th	2017	14.1, better	5.7, better	2.8	2009	12.3	5.5	2.8
6th	2019	13.1, better	4.2	3.2, better	2010	8.8	5.9, better	2.2
7th	2020	13.0, better	5.3, better	4.5, better	2013	6.3	4.3	2.9
8th	2022	12.4, better	5.6, better	3.8, better	2014	7.9	4.8	3.1
9th	2025	13.4, better	5.1, better	3.2, better	2016	3.3	2.5	1.6