Elizabeth Williams vs Michelle Snow

3of 9 lines

6of 9 lines

Elizabeth Williams and Michelle Snow compared on their WNBA careers: Elizabeth Williams played 12 seasons, 2015 to 2026, Michelle Snow 13 seasons, 2002 to 2015. Elizabeth Williams averaged 8.2 points a game to Michelle Snow's 8.4.

Who has the better career numbers?

Michelle Snow leads in 6 of the 9 lines, Elizabeth Williams in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Elizabeth Williams and Michelle Snow career per game

374	GP	402
24.7	MIN	23.6
8.2	PTS	8.4, better
5.5	REB	6.2, better
1.4, better	AST	1.1
0.8, better	STL	0.7
1.4, better	BLK	1
48.7	FG%	50.6, better
0	3P%	18.2, better
62.5	FT%	70.4, better
51.7	TS%	54.9, better

Career totals

Elizabeth Williams and Michelle Snow career totals

3,071	PTS	3,364, better
2,062	REB	2,482, better
512, better	AST	437
317, better	STL	263
522, better	BLK	403
48.7	FG%	50.6, better
0	3P%	18.2, better
62.5	FT%	70.4, better
51.7	TS%	54.9, better

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Elizabeth Williams and Michelle Snow postseason

11	GP	20
28.3	MIN	24.3
8.2, better	PTS	8
8.3, better	REB	6.1
1.3, better	AST	1.2
0.5	STL	0.7, better
1.5, better	BLK	1.1
45.2, better	FG%	43.1
0	3P%	0
56	FT%	75, better
47.4	TS%	50.6, better

Where each stands all time

Elizabeth Williams and Michelle Snow all-time places

95th (3,071)	Points	82nd (3,364), better
32nd (2,062)	Rebounds	22nd (2,482), better
128th (512), better	Assists	152nd (437)
89th (317), better	Steals	118th (263)
10th (522), better	Blocks	16th (403)

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Elizabeth Williams and Michelle Snow season by season

1st	2015	3.3	3.2	0.4	2002	3.9, better	3.7, better	0.4
2nd	2016	11.9, better	8.1, better	1.2	2003	9.2	7.7	1.2
3rd	2017	10.4, better	7.2	1.4, better	2004	8.9	7.7, better	1.0
4th	2018	9.1	5.8	1.4, better	2005	12.0, better	6.8, better	1.2
5th	2019	9.3	6.5	1.2	2006	13.0, better	7.9, better	1.4, better
6th	2020	10.1	5.7	1.4	2007	10.8, better	6.8, better	1.4
7th	2021	5.8	4.9	1.2	2008	9.9, better	6.8, better	1.2
8th	2022	5.4	3.8	0.5	2009	5.4	4.3, better	0.5
9th	2023	9.8	5.8	2.5, better	2010	10.4, better	6.2, better	1.6
10th	2024	10.0, better	7.0, better	1.6	2011	5.9	6.3	1.9, better
11th	2025	8.5, better	5.2	1.8, better	2012	5.9	5.4, better	0.6
12th	2026	5.2, better	3.6	1.4, better	2013	5.1	4.8, better	0.6
13th	—	—	—	—	2015	3.0	1.5	0.0