Ebony Hoffman vs Tamera Young

7of 9 lines

2of 9 lines

Ebony Hoffman and Tamera Young compared on their WNBA careers: Ebony Hoffman played 11 seasons, 2004 to 2014, Tamera Young 12 seasons, 2008 to 2019. Ebony Hoffman averaged 5.9 points a game to Tamera Young's 7.1.

Who has the better career numbers?

Ebony Hoffman leads in 7 of the 9 lines, Tamera Young in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Ebony Hoffman and Tamera Young career per game

327	GP	372
20	MIN	22
5.9	PTS	7.1, better
4.2, better	REB	3.9
1.1	AST	1.5, better
0.9, better	STL	0.8
0.4, better	BLK	0.2
41.2, better	FG%	39.8
34.5, better	3P%	30
83.7, better	FT%	68.6
48.4, better	TS%	45.2

Career totals

Ebony Hoffman and Tamera Young career totals

1,921	PTS	2,639, better
1,384	REB	1,433, better
349	AST	551, better
308, better	STL	304
121, better	BLK	83
41.2, better	FG%	39.8
34.5, better	3P%	30
83.7, better	FT%	68.6
48.4, better	TS%	45.2

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Ebony Hoffman and Tamera Young postseason

26	GP	24
22.8	MIN	22.5
8, better	PTS	6.3
4, better	REB	3.3
0.7	AST	2, better
0.9, better	STL	0.7
0.6, better	BLK	0.3
48, better	FG%	42.1
35.3, better	3P%	0
73.7, better	FT%	54.5
54.2, better	TS%	43.8

Where each stands all time

Ebony Hoffman and Tamera Young all-time places

175th (1,921)	Points	112th (2,639), better
76th (1,384)	Rebounds	71st (1,433), better
197th (349)	Assists	120th (551), better
187th (115), better	3-pointers made	262nd (64)
96th (308), better	Steals	97th (304)
107th (121), better	Blocks	155th (83)

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Ebony Hoffman and Tamera Young season by season

1st	2004	2.0	2.9	0.7	2008	7.3, better	4.2, better	1.2, better
2nd	2005	3.6	2.9, better	0.5	2009	3.8, better	2.1	0.6, better
3rd	2006	6.7	5.9, better	1.4	2010	6.8, better	3.1	1.6, better
4th	2007	4.2	4.0, better	0.8	2011	7.9, better	3.8	1.3, better
5th	2008	10.4, better	7.8, better	1.8, better	2012	8.2	3.7	1.4
6th	2009	9.9, better	5.9, better	1.5, better	2013	5.6	3.8	0.6
7th	2010	8.0, better	4.2	1.3, better	2014	6.7	5.1, better	1.2
8th	2011	7.5, better	4.2, better	1.1	2015	4.5	2.9	1.3, better
9th	2012	2.5	2.1	0.5	2016	8.5, better	4.5, better	1.4, better
10th	2013	3.1	1.9	1.0	2017	8.3, better	3.3, better	1.9, better
11th	2014	1.5	1.8	0.5	2018	9.9, better	5.1, better	2.8, better
12th	—	—	—	—	2019	5.3	3.6	2.0