Ebony Hoffman vs Kelsey Griffin

6of 7 lines

1of 7 lines

Ebony Hoffman and Kelsey Griffin compared on their WNBA careers: Ebony Hoffman played 11 seasons, 2004 to 2014, Kelsey Griffin 5 seasons, 2010 to 2014. Ebony Hoffman averaged 5.9 points a game to Kelsey Griffin's 4.9.

Who has the better career numbers?

Ebony Hoffman leads in 6 of the 7 lines, Kelsey Griffin in 1. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Ebony Hoffman and Kelsey Griffin career per game

327	GP	164
20	MIN	18
5.9, better	PTS	4.9
4.2	REB	4.2
1.1, better	AST	0.8
0.9	STL	0.9
0.4	BLK	0.5, better
41.2, better	FG%	37.6
34.5, better	3P%	25.6
83.7, better	FT%	73.4
48.4, better	TS%	45.9

Career totals

Ebony Hoffman and Kelsey Griffin career totals

1,921, better	PTS	801
1,384, better	REB	683
349, better	AST	126
308, better	STL	147
121, better	BLK	75
41.2, better	FG%	37.6
34.5, better	3P%	25.6
83.7, better	FT%	73.4
48.4, better	TS%	45.9

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Ebony Hoffman and Kelsey Griffin postseason

26	GP	3
22.8	MIN	6.7
8, better	PTS	1
4, better	REB	0.3
0.7, better	AST	0.3
0.9, better	STL	0
0.6, better	BLK	0.3
48, better	FG%	12.5
35.3, better	3P%	0
73.7, better	FT%	50
54.2, better	TS%	16.9

Where each stands all time

Ebony Hoffman and Kelsey Griffin all-time places

175th (1,921), better	Points	—
76th (1,384), better	Rebounds	210th (683)
197th (349), better	Assists	—
187th (115), better	3-pointers made	—
96th (308), better	Steals	223rd (147)
107th (121), better	Blocks	173rd (75)

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Ebony Hoffman and Kelsey Griffin season by season

1st	2004	2.0	2.9	0.7	2010	4.4, better	4.7, better	1.1, better
2nd	2005	3.6	2.9	0.5	2011	3.6	3.1, better	0.5
3rd	2006	6.7, better	5.9, better	1.4, better	2012	3.1	2.9	0.5
4th	2007	4.2	4.0	0.8	2013	8.7, better	5.0, better	0.9, better
5th	2008	10.4, better	7.8, better	1.8, better	2014	4.4	5.1	0.8
6th	2009	9.9	5.9	1.5	—	—	—	—
7th	2010	8.0	4.2	1.3	—	—	—	—
8th	2011	7.5	4.2	1.1	—	—	—	—
9th	2012	2.5	2.1	0.5	—	—	—	—
10th	2013	3.1	1.9	1.0	—	—	—	—
11th	2014	1.5	1.8	0.5	—	—	—	—