Coco Miller vs Tynesha Lewis

7of 9 lines

2of 9 lines

Coco Miller and Tynesha Lewis compared on their WNBA careers: Coco Miller played 12 seasons, 2001 to 2012, Tynesha Lewis 6 seasons, 2001 to 2006. Coco Miller averaged 5.8 points a game to Tynesha Lewis's 4.

Who has the better career numbers?

Coco Miller leads in 7 of the 9 lines, Tynesha Lewis in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Coco Miller and Tynesha Lewis career per game

352	GP	143
18.1	MIN	13.1
5.8, better	PTS	4
2.1, better	REB	1.6
1.4, better	AST	0.9
0.7, better	STL	0.5
0.1	BLK	0.2, better
42.3, better	FG%	40.4
33.6	3P%	35, better
76.4, better	FT%	71.5
48.2, better	TS%	47.8

Career totals

Coco Miller and Tynesha Lewis career totals

2,032, better	PTS	568
750, better	REB	222
503, better	AST	126
238, better	STL	69
29	BLK	29
42.3, better	FG%	40.4
33.6	3P%	35, better
76.4, better	FT%	71.5
48.2, better	TS%	47.8

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Coco Miller and Tynesha Lewis postseason

27	GP	4
18.8	MIN	8.8
6.6, better	PTS	3.5
2.1, better	REB	0.8
1.8, better	AST	1.5
0.8, better	STL	0
0	BLK	0.3, better
38.8	FG%	44.4, better
36.8	3P%	100, better
67.6	FT%	83.3, better
45.6	TS%	60.1, better

Where each stands all time

Coco Miller and Tynesha Lewis all-time places

162nd (2,032), better	Points	—
191st (750), better	Rebounds	—
133rd (503), better	Assists	—
164th (139), better	3-pointers made	—
135th (238), better	Steals	—

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Coco Miller and Tynesha Lewis season by season

1st	2001	1.7	0.5	0.4	2001	3.3, better	2.1, better	0.5, better
2nd	2002	9.3, better	3.6, better	2.6, better	2002	2.0	1.1	0.5
3rd	2003	12.5, better	3.8, better	2.6, better	2003	3.0	1.4	0.9
4th	2004	4.8	1.9, better	1.3	2004	7.2, better	1.7	1.3
5th	2005	4.5, better	1.7, better	1.3, better	2005	3.6	1.2	1.0
6th	2006	6.1, better	2.7, better	1.7, better	2006	2.4	1.4	0.9
7th	2007	4.0	1.6	0.8	—	—	—	—
8th	2008	5.3	2.5	1.4	—	—	—	—
9th	2009	3.9	1.5	1.0	—	—	—	—
10th	2010	3.1	0.6	0.8	—	—	—	—
11th	2011	7.3	1.9	1.4	—	—	—	—
12th	2012	2.6	2.7	1.1	—	—	—	—