Coco Miller vs Natasha Lacy

5of 8 lines

3of 8 lines

Coco Miller and Natasha Lacy compared on their WNBA careers: Coco Miller played 12 seasons, 2001 to 2012, Natasha Lacy 5 seasons, 2010 to 2014. Coco Miller averaged 5.8 points a game to Natasha Lacy's 4.4.

Who has the better career numbers?

Coco Miller leads in 5 of the 8 lines, Natasha Lacy in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Coco Miller and Natasha Lacy career per game
352GP79
18.1MIN13.6
5.8, betterPTS4.4
2.1REB2.1
1.4AST1.8, better
0.7STL1, better
0.1BLK0.2, better
42.3, betterFG%40.8
33.6, better3P%25
76.4, betterFT%59.5
48.2, betterTS%46

Career totals

Coco Miller and Natasha Lacy career totals
2,032, betterPTS347
750, betterREB167
503, betterAST145
238, betterSTL79
29, betterBLK17
42.3, betterFG%40.8
33.6, better3P%25
76.4, betterFT%59.5
48.2, betterTS%46

Where each stands all time

Coco Miller and Natasha Lacy all-time places
162nd (2,032), betterPoints—
191st (750), betterRebounds—
133rd (503), betterAssists—
164th (139), better3-pointers made—
135th (238), betterSteals—

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Coco Miller and Natasha Lacy season by season
PTS: Points scored — a free throw is worth 1, a shot inside the arc 2, beyond it 3.REB: Missed shots the player collected, at either end of the floor.AST: Passes that led directly to a team-mate's basket.PTS: Points scored — a free throw is worth 1, a shot inside the arc 2, beyond it 3.REB: Missed shots the player collected, at either end of the floor.AST: Passes that led directly to a team-mate's basket.
1st20011.70.50.420106.3, better2.3, better3.5, better
2nd20029.3, better3.6, better2.6, better20115.02.21.7
3rd200312.5, better3.8, better2.6, better20123.92.11.3
4th20044.8, better1.91.320132.35.0, better2.0, better
5th20054.5, better1.7, better1.3, better20141.50.80.9
6th20066.12.71.7————
7th20074.01.60.8————
8th20085.32.51.4————
9th20093.91.51.0————
10th20103.10.60.8————
11th20117.31.91.4————
12th20122.62.71.1————