Carolyn Swords vs Kayla Alexander

6of 7 lines

1of 7 lines

Carolyn Swords and Kayla Alexander compared on their WNBA careers: Carolyn Swords played 9 seasons, 2011 to 2020, Kayla Alexander 9 seasons, 2013 to 2026. Carolyn Swords averaged 3.7 points a game to Kayla Alexander's 4.

Who has the better career numbers?

Carolyn Swords leads in 6 of the 7 lines, Kayla Alexander in 1. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Carolyn Swords and Kayla Alexander career per game

250	GP	207
12.5	MIN	11.8
3.7	PTS	4, better
3.3, better	REB	2.8
0.5, better	AST	0.3
0.3, better	STL	0.2
0.4	BLK	0.4
53.4, better	FG%	50.7
0	3P%	0
78.1, better	FT%	76.3
57.5, better	TS%	55.1

Career totals

Carolyn Swords and Kayla Alexander career totals

920, better	PTS	827
814, better	REB	578
132, better	AST	63
71, better	STL	47
104, better	BLK	92
53.4, better	FG%	50.7
0	3P%	0
78.1, better	FT%	76.3
57.5, better	TS%	55.1

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Carolyn Swords and Kayla Alexander postseason

18	GP	3
17.9	MIN	1.3
4.6, better	PTS	1.3
4.4, better	REB	0.7
0.8, better	AST	0
0.4, better	STL	0
0.4, better	BLK	0
58.5	FG%	100, better
0	3P%	0
66.7, better	FT%	0
59.5	TS%	100, better

Where each stands all time

Carolyn Swords and Kayla Alexander all-time places

288th (920), better	Points	—
169th (814), better	Rebounds	241st (578)
126th (104), better	Blocks	144th (92)

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Carolyn Swords and Kayla Alexander season by season

1st	2011	2.7	1.8	0.3	2013	2.8, better	3.0, better	0.3
2nd	2012	4.0, better	3.2, better	0.3, better	2014	2.8	2.0	0.2
3rd	2013	3.7, better	2.6	0.6, better	2015	3.3	3.3, better	0.2
4th	2015	5.1	4.0	0.6, better	2016	8.0, better	4.5, better	0.5
5th	2016	5.2	4.6, better	0.7, better	2017	6.2, better	3.1	0.5
6th	2017	2.6	1.5	0.3, better	2018	2.7, better	2.2, better	0.2
7th	2018	3.9, better	4.7, better	0.9, better	2019	3.0	2.3	0.3
8th	2019	2.6, better	2.2, better	0.3, better	2020	2.3	0.9	0.2
9th	2020	2.9, better	4.6, better	0.9, better	2026	2.3	2.8	0.5