Belinda Snell vs Shay Murphy

3of 8 lines

5of 8 lines

Belinda Snell and Shay Murphy compared on their WNBA careers: Belinda Snell played 6 seasons, 2005 to 2011, Shay Murphy 9 seasons, 2007 to 2017. Belinda Snell averaged 3.8 points a game to Shay Murphy's 4.7. Belinda Snell won 1 title, Shay Murphy won 2 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Shay Murphy leads in 5 of the 8 lines, Belinda Snell in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Belinda Snell and Shay Murphy career per game

133	GP	225
11.7	MIN	12.6
3.8	PTS	4.7, better
1.6	REB	2.4, better
1, better	AST	0.7
0.5	STL	0.6, better
0.1	BLK	0.1
35.3	FG%	36.6, better
31.6	3P%	32.1, better
83.1, better	FT%	76.2
50.2, better	TS%	47.7

Career totals

Belinda Snell and Shay Murphy career totals

509	PTS	1,056, better
210	REB	532, better
130	AST	162, better
72	STL	142, better
13	BLK	27, better
35.3	FG%	36.6, better
31.6	3P%	32.1, better
83.1, better	FT%	76.2
50.2, better	TS%	47.7

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Belinda Snell and Shay Murphy postseason

11	GP	13
5.9	MIN	5.8
1.2, better	PTS	0.8
1	REB	1.2, better
0.7, better	AST	0.4
0.1	STL	0.2, better
0	BLK	0
15.4	FG%	22.2, better
20	3P%	28.6, better
50, better	FT%	0
24.2	TS%	26.5, better

Where each stands all time

Belinda Snell and Shay Murphy all-time places

195th (108)	3-pointers made	170th (134), better
—	Points	261st (1,056), better
—	Rebounds	253rd (532), better
—	Steals	229th (142), better

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Belinda Snell and Shay Murphy titles and awards
Belinda Snell	Title or award	Shay Murphy
1	Championships	2, better

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Belinda Snell and Shay Murphy season by season

1st	2005	3.3	1.8	0.9, better	2007	5.2, better	3.3, better	0.5
2nd	2006	3.3, better	1.3	0.6, better	2008	2.2	1.5, better	0.5
3rd	2007	3.6	1.5	1.5, better	2009	4.2, better	1.8, better	0.4
4th	2009	6.2, better	2.3	1.2	2010	5.1	3.1, better	1.2
5th	2010	4.5	2.0	2.5, better	2011	9.8, better	4.8, better	1.1
6th	2011	2.0	0.7	0.3	2012	8.5, better	2.9, better	0.9, better
7th	—	—	—	—	2013	3.1	1.9	0.3
8th	—	—	—	—	2014	3.9	1.7	1.1
9th	—	—	—	—	2017	2.5	1.5	0.7