Barbara Farris vs Megan Frazee

5of 8 lines

3of 8 lines

Barbara Farris and Megan Frazee compared on their WNBA careers: Barbara Farris played 10 seasons, 2000 to 2009, Megan Frazee 2 seasons, 2009 to 2010. Barbara Farris averaged 3.9 points a game to Megan Frazee's 4.7. Barbara Farris won 1 title.

Who has the better career numbers?

Barbara Farris leads in 5 of the 8 lines, Megan Frazee in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Barbara Farris and Megan Frazee career per game

280	GP	39
16	MIN	10.9
3.9	PTS	4.7, better
3, better	REB	2.7
0.6, better	AST	0.4
0.4, better	STL	0.2
0.1	BLK	0.1
43.3, better	FG%	40.5
0	3P%	32.6, better
68.2	FT%	69, better
50, better	TS%	49.9

Career totals

Barbara Farris and Megan Frazee career totals

1,094, better	PTS	183
831, better	REB	105
160, better	AST	16
102, better	STL	8
32, better	BLK	5
43.3, better	FG%	40.5
0	3P%	32.6, better
68.2	FT%	69, better
50, better	TS%	49.9

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Barbara Farris and Megan Frazee postseason

16	GP	1
14.7	MIN	7
3.4, better	PTS	2
2.3, better	REB	0
0.4, better	AST	0
0.1, better	STL	0
0	BLK	0
39.6, better	FG%	0
0	3P%	0
68	FT%	100, better
46.6	TS%	53.2, better

Where each stands all time

Barbara Farris and Megan Frazee all-time places

258th (1,094), better	Points	—
164th (831), better	Rebounds	—
283rd (102), better	Steals	—

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Barbara Farris and Megan Frazee titles and awards
Barbara Farris	Title or award	Megan Frazee
1, better	Championships	—

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Barbara Farris and Megan Frazee season by season

1st	2000	3.2	2.3	0.1	2009	5.0, better	2.9, better	0.5, better
2nd	2001	4.2, better	3.5, better	0.5, better	2010	3.8	2.1	0.1
3rd	2002	4.5	2.9	0.5	—	—	—	—
4th	2003	3.7	2.4	0.7	—	—	—	—
5th	2004	4.5	2.3	0.3	—	—	—	—
6th	2005	2.4	2.5	0.6	—	—	—	—
7th	2006	7.7	5.2	1.5	—	—	—	—
8th	2007	1.9	1.5	0.5	—	—	—	—
9th	2008	3.5	3.8	0.2	—	—	—	—
10th	2009	1.3	1.4	0.4	—	—	—	—