Avery Warley-Talbert vs Kayla Alexander

2of 8 lines

6of 8 lines

Avery Warley-Talbert and Kayla Alexander compared on their WNBA careers: Avery Warley-Talbert played 7 seasons, 2012 to 2020, Kayla Alexander 9 seasons, 2013 to 2026. Avery Warley-Talbert averaged 2.6 points a game to Kayla Alexander's 4.

Who has the better career numbers?

Kayla Alexander leads in 6 of the 8 lines, Avery Warley-Talbert in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Avery Warley-Talbert and Kayla Alexander career per game

113	GP	207
12.5	MIN	11.8
2.6	PTS	4, better
3.7, better	REB	2.8
0.2	AST	0.3, better
0.3, better	STL	0.2
0.3	BLK	0.4, better
44	FG%	50.7, better
0	3P%	0
70.1	FT%	76.3, better
49.1	TS%	55.1, better

Career totals

Avery Warley-Talbert and Kayla Alexander career totals

294	PTS	827, better
422	REB	578, better
19	AST	63, better
37	STL	47, better
37	BLK	92, better
44	FG%	50.7, better
0	3P%	0
70.1	FT%	76.3, better
49.1	TS%	55.1, better

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Avery Warley-Talbert and Kayla Alexander postseason

6	GP	3
4.8	MIN	1.3
0.8	PTS	1.3, better
1, better	REB	0.7
0.2, better	AST	0
0.2, better	STL	0
0	BLK	0
33.3	FG%	100, better
0	3P%	0
50, better	FT%	0
36.3	TS%	100, better

Where each stands all time

Avery Warley-Talbert and Kayla Alexander all-time places

289th (422)	Rebounds	241st (578), better
284th (37)	Blocks	144th (92), better

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Neither has a championship or an award on file.

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Avery Warley-Talbert and Kayla Alexander season by season

1st	2012	3.1, better	5.7, better	0.2	2013	2.8	3.0	0.3, better
2nd	2013	1.9	3.1, better	0.1	2014	2.8, better	2.0	0.2, better
3rd	2014	4.2, better	3.8, better	0.1	2015	3.3	3.3	0.2, better
4th	2015	1.5	2.7	0.2	2016	8.0, better	4.5, better	0.5, better
5th	2016	0.0	1.0	0.3	2017	6.2, better	3.1, better	0.5, better
6th	2019	1.0	2.3, better	0.0	2018	2.7, better	2.2	0.2, better
7th	2020	2.7	2.7, better	1.0, better	2019	3.0, better	2.3	0.3
8th	—	—	—	—	2020	2.3	0.9	0.2
9th	—	—	—	—	2026	2.3	2.8	0.5