Amber Harris vs Shae Kelley

9of 9 lines

0of 9 lines

Amber Harris and Shae Kelley compared on their WNBA careers: Amber Harris played 5 seasons, 2011 to 2018, Shae Kelley 1 season, 2015 to 2015. Amber Harris averaged 2.7 points a game to Shae Kelley's 0.1. Amber Harris won 2 titles, Shae Kelley won 1 title.

Who has the better career numbers?

Amber Harris leads in 9 of the 9 lines, Shae Kelley in 0. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Amber Harris and Shae Kelley career per game

112	GP	8
8.4	MIN	2.3
2.7, better	PTS	0.1
1.8, better	REB	0.4
0.5, better	AST	0.1
0.2, better	STL	0.1
0.3, better	BLK	0
39.4, better	FG%	0
20.9, better	3P%	0
70.7, better	FT%	50
45.3, better	TS%	12.9

Career totals

Amber Harris and Shae Kelley career totals

297, better	PTS	1
196, better	REB	3
51, better	AST	1
19, better	STL	1
39, better	BLK	0
39.4, better	FG%	0
20.9, better	3P%	0
70.7, better	FT%	50
45.3, better	TS%	12.9

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Amber Harris and Shae Kelley postseason

17	GP	1
4.2	MIN	0
1.4, better	PTS	0
0.9, better	REB	0
0.1, better	AST	0
0.1, better	STL	0
0.1, better	BLK	0
40, better	FG%	0
40, better	3P%	0
50, better	FT%	0
44.4	TS%	—

Where each stands all time

Amber Harris and Shae Kelley all-time places
Amber Harris	All-time rank	Shae Kelley
280th (39), better	Blocks	—

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Amber Harris and Shae Kelley titles and awards
Amber Harris	Title or award	Shae Kelley
2, better	Championships	1

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Amber Harris and Shae Kelley season by season

1st	2011	3.3, better	2.2, better	0.4, better	2015	0.1	0.4	0.1
2nd	2012	3.5	1.9	0.6	—	—	—	—
3rd	2013	2.4	1.5	0.7	—	—	—	—
4th	2017	1.6	1.6	0.2	—	—	—	—
5th	2018	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	—	—	—