Amber Harris vs Michelle Campbell

7of 8 lines

1of 8 lines

Amber Harris and Michelle Campbell compared on their WNBA careers: Amber Harris played 5 seasons, 2011 to 2018, Michelle Campbell 3 seasons, 1999 to 2013. Amber Harris averaged 2.7 points a game to Michelle Campbell's 1.7. Amber Harris won 2 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Amber Harris leads in 7 of the 8 lines, Michelle Campbell in 1. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Amber Harris and Michelle Campbell career per game

112	GP	31
8.4	MIN	7.7
2.7, better	PTS	1.7
1.8, better	REB	1.5
0.5, better	AST	0.2
0.2	STL	0.2
0.3, better	BLK	0.2
39.4, better	FG%	31.4
20.9, better	3P%	0
70.7	FT%	73.3, better
45.3, better	TS%	42.1

Career totals

Amber Harris and Michelle Campbell career totals

297, better	PTS	54
196, better	REB	48
51, better	AST	5
19, better	STL	5
39, better	BLK	6
39.4, better	FG%	31.4
20.9, better	3P%	0
70.7	FT%	73.3, better
45.3, better	TS%	42.1

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Amber Harris and Michelle Campbell postseason

17	GP	1
4.2	MIN	1
1.4, better	PTS	0
0.9, better	REB	0
0.1, better	AST	0
0.1, better	STL	0
0.1, better	BLK	0
40, better	FG%	0
40, better	3P%	0
50, better	FT%	0
44.4	TS%	—

Where each stands all time

Amber Harris and Michelle Campbell all-time places
Amber Harris	All-time rank	Michelle Campbell
280th (39), better	Blocks	—

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Amber Harris and Michelle Campbell titles and awards
Amber Harris	Title or award	Michelle Campbell
2, better	Championships	—

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Amber Harris and Michelle Campbell season by season

1st	2011	3.3, better	2.2, better	0.4, better	1999	1.0	0.8	0.3
2nd	2012	3.5, better	1.9, better	0.6, better	2000	1.2	0.4	0.2
3rd	2013	2.4, better	1.5	0.7, better	2013	1.7	1.5	0.2
4th	2017	1.6	1.6	0.2	—	—	—	—
5th	2018	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	—	—	—