Amber Harris vs Jessica Moore

3of 9 lines

6of 9 lines

Amber Harris and Jessica Moore compared on their WNBA careers: Amber Harris played 5 seasons, 2011 to 2018, Jessica Moore 9 seasons, 2005 to 2013. Amber Harris averaged 2.7 points a game to Jessica Moore's 2.9. Amber Harris won 2 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Jessica Moore leads in 6 of the 9 lines, Amber Harris in 3. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Amber Harris and Jessica Moore career per game

112	GP	223
8.4	MIN	13.1
2.7	PTS	2.9, better
1.8	REB	2, better
0.5, better	AST	0.4
0.2	STL	0.3, better
0.3, better	BLK	0.1
39.4	FG%	42.4, better
20.9, better	3P%	0
70.7	FT%	73.5, better
45.3	TS%	47.9, better

Career totals

Amber Harris and Jessica Moore career totals

297	PTS	644, better
196	REB	451, better
51	AST	97, better
19	STL	66, better
39, better	BLK	32
39.4	FG%	42.4, better
20.9, better	3P%	0
70.7	FT%	73.5, better
45.3	TS%	47.9, better

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Amber Harris and Jessica Moore postseason

17	GP	27
4.2	MIN	10.6
1.4	PTS	2.1, better
0.9	REB	1.5, better
0.1	AST	0.4, better
0.1	STL	0.3, better
0.1	BLK	0.1
40	FG%	40.4, better
40, better	3P%	0
50	FT%	85.7, better
44.4	TS%	45.9, better

Where each stands all time

Amber Harris and Jessica Moore all-time places

280th (39), better	Blocks	—
—	Rebounds	282nd (451), better

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Amber Harris and Jessica Moore titles and awards
Amber Harris	Title or award	Jessica Moore
2, better	Championships	—

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Amber Harris and Jessica Moore season by season

1st	2011	3.3, better	2.2, better	0.4, better	2005	0.5	0.6	0.1
2nd	2012	3.5	1.9	0.6	2006	4.3, better	2.9, better	0.7, better
3rd	2013	2.4	1.5	0.7, better	2007	4.2, better	3.0, better	0.6
4th	2017	1.6, better	1.6	0.2	2008	1.4	1.6	0.6, better
5th	2018	0.0	0.0	0.0	2009	4.8, better	3.1, better	0.5, better
6th	—	—	—	—	2010	3.1	2.1	0.4
7th	—	—	—	—	2011	1.7	0.8	0.2
8th	—	—	—	—	2012	1.7	1.1	0.1
9th	—	—	—	—	2013	0.0	1.0	0.0