Amber Harris vs Farhiya Abdi

5of 7 lines

2of 7 lines

Amber Harris and Farhiya Abdi compared on their WNBA careers: Amber Harris played 5 seasons, 2011 to 2018, Farhiya Abdi 3 seasons, 2013 to 2015. Amber Harris averaged 2.7 points a game to Farhiya Abdi's 2.9. Amber Harris won 2 titles.

Who has the better career numbers?

Amber Harris leads in 5 of the 7 lines, Farhiya Abdi in 2. Bold marks the better figure; playing time — games, minutes, at-bats, innings — is not scored.

Amber Harris and Farhiya Abdi career per game

112	GP	51
8.4	MIN	9.8
2.7	PTS	2.9, better
1.8, better	REB	1
0.5	AST	0.5
0.2	STL	0.2
0.3, better	BLK	0.1
39.4, better	FG%	38.3
20.9	3P%	25, better
70.7, better	FT%	68.2
45.3, better	TS%	43.4

Career totals

Amber Harris and Farhiya Abdi career totals

297, better	PTS	149
196, better	REB	51
51, better	AST	23
19, better	STL	10
39, better	BLK	3
39.4, better	FG%	38.3
20.9	3P%	25, better
70.7, better	FT%	68.2
45.3, better	TS%	43.4

How do they compare in the playoffs?

Amber Harris and Farhiya Abdi postseason

17	GP	1
4.2	MIN	4
1.4	PTS	2, better
0.9, better	REB	0
0.1, better	AST	0
0.1, better	STL	0
0.1	BLK	1, better
40	FG%	100, better
40, better	3P%	0
50, better	FT%	0
44.4	TS%	53.2, better

Where each stands all time

Amber Harris and Farhiya Abdi all-time places
Amber Harris	All-time rank	Farhiya Abdi
280th (39), better	Blocks	—

Among the WNBA players with a career line on file, regular season, counting stats only — the same lists the records pages run on.

Titles and awards

Amber Harris and Farhiya Abdi titles and awards
Amber Harris	Title or award	Farhiya Abdi
2, better	Championships	—

Awards come from the league’s published winner lists; a championship counts a season played for the club that won it.

Season by season

Lined up by career year, not by calendar: each row is the players’ nth season.

Amber Harris and Farhiya Abdi season by season

1st	2011	3.3, better	2.2, better	0.4	2013	2.2	0.7	0.5, better
2nd	2012	3.5, better	1.9, better	0.6, better	2014	2.5	0.5	0.3
3rd	2013	2.4	1.5	0.7, better	2015	4.1, better	1.8, better	0.5
4th	2017	1.6	1.6	0.2	—	—	—	—
5th	2018	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	—	—	—